NOM +37.3% (Directional Strategy Resonance)

Coin: NOM/USDT
Risk: medium
Level of understanding: beginner

Entry reasons

Cluster chart: during the local decline, a W-shaped formation was formed, within which volume clusters began to develop (blue rectangle). Within these clusters, there was a significant dominance of market sell orders (red rectangle).

Despite the substantial selling volume, the price did not show further decline and did not update the local minimum. On the contrary, it stabilized and began to gradually rise (red line).

Such a reaction indicates the formation of signs of a local deficit and a weakening of sellers’ initiative. When significant selling volumes stop leading to price decline, this often becomes a signal of a possible shift in initiative or the formation of a local reversal.

In the Dashboard
Delta / Volume balance: in aggregated form, data across all pairs and exchanges confirms the picture observed on the cluster chart. During the period under review, significant pressure from market sells was recorded, which is clearly reflected in the delta histogram (red rectangle and arrow).

At the same time, the price did not demonstrate a comparable reaction to this volume, which indicates its low efficiency.

Such behavior indicates active absorption of incoming market sell volume by limit buyers. As a result, local support is formed in the current range, which further confirms signs of a supply deficit and a shift in balance toward buyers.

Exit reasons

Cluster chart: from the entry point, the price moved nearly 40%, which represents a strong price movement. During the growth, volatility increased noticeably, indicating heightened market activity.

After that, a pullback formed, during which market sell volumes began to dominate, accompanied by a price decline (red rectangle and arrow). Such a reaction indicates a recovery in seller efficiency in the current zone.

This dynamic suggests a decrease in the stability of the upward movement and an increased probability of a deeper correction. Under these conditions, further holding of the position is accompanied by increased risks, making profit-taking a justified decision.

Conclusion

This analysis clearly demonstrates that the key factor in market analysis is not the volume itself, but its efficiency and impact on price.

At the entry stage, despite the pronounced dominance of market sells, the price stopped reacting with a decline and even began to show signs of growth. This indicated a weakening of sellers and active absorption of their volume by limit buyers, which led to the formation of a local deficit and created conditions for further upward movement.

However, as the growth developed, signs of a change in market structure began to appear: volatility increased, and during the pullback, sellers once again started to exert noticeable influence on the price.

Thus, the entry was based on signs of seller inefficiency and the formation of a deficit, while the exit was based on the recovery of their efficiency and increasing risks of holding the position further. Such an approach allows evaluating the market through the interaction of volume and price, significantly improving the quality and justification of trading decisions over time.

Follow new insights in our telegram channel.

No need to invent complex schemes and look for the "grail". Use the Resonance platform tools.

Register via the link — get a bonus and start earning:
OKX | BingX | KuCoin.

Promo code TOPBLOG gives you a 10% discount on any Resonance tariff plan.